EVALUATION
There were minor inconsistencies, but overall the design reflected Google Material Design standards.
We conducted sessions with five experts—four MS-HCI students from Georgia Tech and one Deaf and Hard of Hearing (DHH) education specialist.
These sessions allowed us to gather design feedback from the HCI students and gain valuable insights into the unique needs of DHH users from the education specialist.
Relying solely on color to convey information is neither intuitive nor accessible, especially for colorblind users.
We replaced color indicators with audio bars that increase with background noise, providing a more accessible representation.
The sound history feature was initially perceived as hidden, and participants expressed uncertainty about its necessity.
The original flow let users view audio alert history during a journey, but alerts lacked prominence, and timestamps were unclear. We enhanced the UI to highlight alerts, and to emphasize the most recent event.
Our new features lacked memorability, but what would it take to improve them?
While a reminder feature could highlight the new capabilities, it would ultimately increase the user's cognitive load, resulting in more drawbacks than benefits for the design.
REFLECTION
Establishing strong relationships valuably shaped our prototype
Our prototype emerged from valuable insights gathered through user interviews, feedback sessions, and evaluations—insights made possible by strong connections with the local Atlanta DHH community and experts nationwide.
We worked with several participants multiple times, which was rewarding as they could see how their feedback directly shaped the design.
Incorporating Surveys for Broader Feedback
While one-on-one sessions with a small group provided valuable insights, we recognize the need for broader data collection through surveys.
As we continue refining our prototype for student competitions, we plan to distribute it widely and collect additional feedback from our target user group via surveys.